Examining the Role of Tourism in Development and Reconstruction of Rural Regions (Kharghan Area, Owj City)

Document Type : scientific-research article

Authors

• Hamide Mahmoodi ¹
• Maryam Rajabi ²
• Ahmad Roumiani ¹

¹ Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

² Lecturer Kheradgarayan Mother Institute of Higher Education of Mashhad

https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v16i2.52885

Abstract

Extended Abstract

Introduction

Rural tourism is one of the most important subcategories of tourism. In a developing country such as Iran, a large portion of its total population, i.e. 28%, reside in rural areas. Subsequently, rural tourism can play a significant role in reducing the socioeconomic challenges in rural areas including migration to the cities, the low income, the low occupation rate and the low productivity in agriculture, lack of proper developmental, welfare, and service infrastructures, etc.
2 Theoretical Framework
Tourism involves a set of activities which are related to the short-term, temporary movement of people to destinations outside their living and working environments (Burkart et al., 1974). The primary feature of such activities is that they take place in a short time with no overnight stops at the destination (Vanhove, 2005). The associated activities are valuable sources to diversify various opportunities for the income generation, occupation, and the promotion of new economic activities alongside agriculture; thus, it is a substantial opportunity for the development of rural regions. There are a number of different insights and strategies posed with respect to the importance of tourism including (a) rural tourism as a development strategy, and (b) rural tourism as a policy to reconstruct rural settlements. In the former, it is believed that tourism could be of significant economic impact and can slowly diminish the process of rural evacuation and migration to the cities. In the latter, tourism is regarded as the main part of a rural reconstruction, even in regions where no considerable boom is observed in tourist activities since past. The advocates of this theory believe that they are capable of reducing rural producers’ overreliance on agriculture by exploiting them in newer economic opportunities so as to compete against globalized marketing (Ghaderi, 2003).

Method

The present applied study is conducted using the descriptive-analytical approach. Data collection was done using questionnaires and observation. The total population of the study includes more than 2177 households living in Vali’asr Hesar village. 249 cases were selected using Cochran’s formula where p = 70, q = 30, and D = 0.05 being calculated with 95% confidence level. Households at each village were selected through simple random sampling to comply with the equal opportunity principle. The reliability of the data was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. According to Table 3, the data are satisfactory. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics such as Friedman’s test, multivariable regression, and path analysis in SPSS. EQS software was also used to provide fitness for the path analysis model.

Results and Discussion

Tourism and its related activities have currently occupy a significant position in the economy of various countries. It is considered as the third most profitable section in regional and national economies in terms of income generation and job opportunities following important sectors such as petroleum, petrochemical industries, and auto manufacturing. Hence, the present study was conducted to examine the role of tourism in the development and reconstruction of rural regions. It was shown that the highest average ratings, i.e. 3.78 and 2.59, belonged to the physical and economic dimensions of the examined rural area, respectively. On the other hand, the examination of the regression fitness model showed the positive impact of tourists in rural development and reconstruction as 0.64. Among the four indices of tourism examined in sample villages, economic and environmental index components with values of 0.374 and 0.247 respectively have the highest and lowest impacts on rural development and reconstruction according to the tourists.

Conclusion

According to the results of Friedman’s test, the mean differences through the perspective of respondents were reported to be completely significant at the alpha level of 0.01. Meanwhile, the highest rating average with values of 3.78 and 2.59 belonged to the physical and economic dimensions of the examined total regions, respectively. Furthermore, the regression fitness model showed the positive impact of tourists on rural development and reconstruction with the value of 0.64. Among the four indices of tourism examined in sample villages, economic and environmental index components with values of 0.374 and 0.247 have the highest and lowest impacts on the rural development and reconstruction, respectively. Based on the findings of the path analysis, the highest and lowest total impacts on rural development and reconstruction belong to economic and environmental dimensions with values of 0.448 and 0.301, respectively. In addition, the path analysis was found to be of proper fitness considering the output obtained from EQS. Subsequently, given its impacts on various economic, sociocultural, environmental, and physical dimensions of rural areas, it is recommended to employ rural tourism in the villages under examination as a strategy to develop and reconstruct adjacent villages where there is a lack of attention.
 

Keywords

• Tourism
• reconstruction
• Rural Development
• rural fence Vali aser Village

20.1001.1.20081391.1397.16.2.1.9

References

9. Besculides, A., Lee, M. E., & McCormick, P. J. (2002). Residents' perceptions of the cultural benefits of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 303-319.

10. Blancas, F. J., Gonzalez, M., Lozano-Oyola, M., & Perez, F. (2010). The assessment of sustainable tourism: Application to Spanish coastal destinations. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), 484-492.

11. Byrd, E. T., Bosley, H. E., & Dronberger, M. G. (2009). Comparisons of stakeholder perceptions of tourism impacts in rural eastern North Carolina. Tourism Management, 30(5), 693-703.

12. Castellani, V., Sala, S., & Pitea, D. (2007). A new method for tourism carrying capacity assessment. Ecosystems and Sustainable Development VI. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 106, 365-374.

13. Ciolac, R., Csosz, I., Balan, I., & Dincu, A. M. (2011). Research regarding the impact of rural tourism forms on the rural area. Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 44(2), 475-478.

14. Coccossis, H. (2008). Cultural heritage, local resources and sustainable tourism. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 10(1), 8-14.

15. Constantin, D. L., & Mitrut, C. (2008). Tourism, cultural resources and regional competitiveness: a case study in Romania. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 10(1), 48-60.

16. Craik, J. (1995). Are there cultural limits to tourism?. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 3(2), 87-98.

17. Friedel, M., & Chewings, V. (2008). Community engagement in regional development: A case study of a systems approach to tourism in central Australia. The Rangeland Journa, 9(1), 1-33.

18. Gallent, N., Mace, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2017). Second homes: European perspectives and UK policies. Routledge. London.

19. Horakova, H. (2010). Transformation of rural communities: Mobility, tourism and identity. Acta Historica Universitatis Klaipedensis, 20, 38-51.

20. Leal, J. (2006, July). Multiple residential practices and second homes in southern Europe: The Spanish case. In ENHR Conference-Housing in an expanding Europe: Theory, policy, participation and implementation , International Conference Ljubljana, Slovenia, (2-5).

21. Lee, C. C., & Chang, C. P. (2008). Tourism development and economic growth: A closer look at panels. Tourism Management, 29(1), 180-192.

22. Liu, A., & Wall, G. (2006). Planning tourism employment: A developing country perspective. Tourism Management, 27(1), 159-170.

23. Liu, C. Z. (2010). Rural development and rural tourism in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Arts and Sciences, 1(2), 211-227.

24. Millan, M. G., Morales, F., & Castro, M. S. (2011). Analisis de la oferta y la demanda de oleoturismo en el sur de España: un estudio de caso Turydesturismo Y Desarrollo, 4(11), 1-19.

25. Miller, G., Rathouse, K., Scarles, C., Holmes, K., & Tribe, J. (2010). Public understanding of sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(3), 627-645.

26. Paracchini, M. L., Pacini, C., Jones, M. L. M., & Perez-Soba, M. (2011). An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options. Ecological Indicators, 11(1), 71-80.

27. Paris, C. (2006). Multiple “homes”, dwelling, hyper-mobility, and emergent transnational second home ownership in ENHR Conference–Housing in an expanding Europe: Theory, policy, participation and implementation. Retrieved from http: //enhr2006ljubljana. uirs. si/publish/-W24_Paris. pdf

28. Perpar, A., & Udovc, A. (2012). Development Potentials of Rural Areas – The Case of Slovenia. Slovenia: Publisher InTech.

29. Psaltopoulos, D., Skuras, D., & Thomson, K. J. (2011). Employment effects of private investment initiatives in rural areas of southern Europe: A regional SAM approach. Agricultural Economics Review, 12(2), 50-61.

30. Pulido, J. I., & Cardenas, P. J. (2011). El turismo rural en España. Orientaciones estrategicas para una tipologia aún en desarrollo. Boletin de la Asociacion de Geografos Españoles, 56, 155-176.

31. Sebele, L. S. (2010). Community-based tourism ventures, benefits and challenges: Khama rhino sanctuary trust, central district, Botswana. Tourism Management, 31(1), 136-146.

32. Sharpley, R. (2002). Rural tourism and the challenge of tourism diversification: the case of Cyprus. Tourism Management, 23(3), 233-244.

33. Szymanska, E. (2013). Implementation of sustainable tourism concept by the tourists visiting national parks. Journal of Environmental and Tourism Analyses, 1(1), 64-79.

34. Tanguay, G. A., Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J. F., & Lanoie, P. (2010). Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), 407-418.

35. UNWTO. (2008). World tourism barometer (Vol 6). Madrid: United Nations World Tourism Organiztion World Tourism Organization Madrid, Spain.

36. Vargas-Sanchez, A., Porras-Bueno, N., & de los Ángeles Plaza-Mejia, M. (2011). Explaining residents’ attitudes to tourism: Is a universal model possible?. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(2), 460-480.

37. Vazquez, D. L. T., Trechera, H., & Morales, F. (2012). Rural tourism as an alternative to the development for rural areas and the creation of employment. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(20), 162-174.

38. Zeng, B., & Ryan, C. (2012). Assisting the poor in China through tourism development: A review of research. Tourism Management, 33(2), 239-248.